Breaking
In Business/Advice Long read · 7 min

Law firm warns SMEs at risk from ‘cybersquatters’

A leading law firm is warning that SMEs are not doing enough to protect themselves from the threat of cybersquatters.

2628-original
Share𝕏inf

Intellectual property specialists Capital Law says SMEs need to do more to prevent themselves falling victim to cybersquatters, who can damage their brand and cost companies tens of thousands of pounds in legal action.

Cybersquatting, also known as domain squatting, occurs when someone registers or uses an internet domain name that is the same as, or similar to, a name belonging to someone else; usually a company, charity or celebrity’s name. Typosquatting, a specific form of cybersquatting, is also popular, where someone registers a popular misspelling of a company’s brand name as a domain name.

The cybersquatter, typically an individual acting alone, buys a domain name for just a few pounds and then aims to profit from the goodwill attached to a company’s brand. This can be done by either selling the domain name to the “wronged” company  at an inflated price or by using the domain name to divert traffic from the legitimate brand’s website to their own. In 2008, there were a record 2,329 cases of cybersquatting according to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) – just the tip of the iceberg as WIPO only records cases referred for dispute resolution.

Free newsletters

The stories that matter to UK business, straight to your inbox.

Nicola McNeely, a partner at Capital Law, who specialises in internet-related intellectual property, said: “Many SMEs are not doing enough to protect themselves from the unscrupulous and unlawful acts of cybersquatters who typically hold website domain names hostage and then demand a high ransom to transfer them to their rightful owners.

“Cybersquatters use various tactics to profit from their unlawful activities, either offering to sell the domain name to the company whose trade mark it infringes, or to one of its competitors. They may also use the domain name to offer similar goods and services to those offered by the trade mark owner, benefitting from the goodwill attached to the recognised brand name.

“In some cases the infringing party can create a mock website with misleading and derogatory comments about the legitimate company. The cybersquatter can also make money by directing visitors to pay-per-click advertising. More worryingly, criminals can use cybersquatting to collect customer passwords or credit card details,” he added.

When companies register their domain name they frequently use one or two suffixes such as .co.uk or .com, providing cybersquatters with the opportunity to use a company’s name with another suffixes such as .org, or .net etc. According to Capital Law, businesses that fall victim to domain name infringement can fight back by implementing various cost effective dispute resolution processes.

Nicola continued: “Companies with a registered trademark can take legal action for trademark infringement or, where no trademarks have been registered, action can, in certain circumstances, be taken against the cybersquatters for ‘passing-off’.

“While businesses can seek emergency court injunctions against cybersquatters within a matter of days, this is often costly and, where the cybersquatter in question is a private individual, there may not be the potential to recover legal costs even if successful.”
She added: “When it comes to cybersquatting there is no one size fits all solution and prevention is better than cure. Taking the correct preventative measures can dramatically reduce the potential for cybersquatting. The best way for companies to protect themselves is to consult with legal specialists at an early stage in their business development to ensure there are no gaps in their domain name portfolios and to remain vigilant.”

Top tips to help your business

More from Advice.

More →