I Ran an Intranet for 850 Staff Across 20 Countries. Here’s What UK SMEs Get Wrong About Productivity

The UK risks losing its leadership position in artificial intelligence (AI) without a clear national strategy for data centres, a key player in the sector has warned.

Before I founded Techspire IT, I spent years running a live intranet for more than 850 staff across 20 countries at a multinational healthcare group. Different languages, different time zones, strict regulatory requirements.

You would expect the support tickets to be wildly varied. They were not. The single most common ticket, month after month, was a version of the same five words: “I can’t find the document.”

That ticket taught me more about workplace productivity than any vendor demo ever did. And it is the same problem quietly draining time from UK small and medium businesses right now, usually without anyone naming it.

The productivity problem nobody puts on a spreadsheet

We tend to think productivity is about effort. People not working hard enough, or not having the right skills. In my experience it is almost never that. It is friction. It is the twenty minutes hunting for the current version of a policy, the second message asking a colleague where something lives, the meeting booked only because nobody could find the answer on their own.

The numbers back this up. McKinsey found that the average employee spends 1.8 hours every working day, around 9.3 hours a week, simply searching for and gathering information (McKinsey Global Institute, The Social Economy, 2012). Asana’s Anatomy of Work research puts 60% of the working day into “work about work”, the coordinating and chasing and status-checking that surrounds the actual job (Asana, Anatomy of Work, 2026).

Put a pound sign on it and the picture sharpens. With an estimated fully loaded employer cost of around £27 an hour (based on ONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings data, 2025, plus employer on-costs), those 9.3 hours a week of searching cost a 30-person business north of £340,000 a year in staff time. That is not a software budget. That is a salary line nobody is tracking.

Three things UK SMEs get wrong

Watching this play out at enterprise scale, then working with smaller UK businesses since, I see the same three mistakes repeatedly.

First, they buy tools, not outcomes. A team feels disorganised, so someone buys a project app. Communication feels messy, so someone adds a chat tool. Each purchase solves one symptom and adds another silo. Within two years the average SME is running six or more disconnected systems, and the gaps between them are where the time goes.

Second, they confuse “we have it” with “people use it”. At the healthcare group, we had every feature you could want. Adoption was still the hard part. A capability nobody opens is worth exactly nothing. SMEs make the same error in miniature: they judge a platform by its feature list rather than by whether a non-technical employee can actually find what they need in under a minute.

Third, they treat search as an afterthought. This is the big one. Every platform claims to have search. Very few have search that understands a real question, respects who is allowed to see what, and returns a trustworthy answer. When search is poor, every other feature becomes harder to reach, and the document goes unfound regardless of how good your filing is.

What actually moved the needle

When we finally cut that “I can’t find it” ticket volume, it was not a new feature that did it. It was three quieter things working together.

We consolidated. Fewer systems meant fewer places a document could hide. We made permissions do real work, so people saw what was relevant to them and were not drowning in everything else. And we fixed search so that asking a plain question returned a plain answer, scoped to what that person was allowed to access. The better platforms now do this out of the box, with permission-aware AI search that grounds every answer in your own content.

None of that is glamorous. All of it is what productivity actually depends on. If you are weighing up options, it is worth understanding how the main UK intranet platforms actually compare on exactly these points, because the marketing pages rarely tell you.

The advantage SMEs have, and enterprises don’t

Here is the part that should encourage any UK business owner reading this. The healthcare group could not easily start again. Twenty countries of legacy process, integrations and habit make wholesale change slow and expensive. A 30 or 80-person UK business has the opposite situation. You can get this right from the beginning, or fix it in weeks rather than years.

You do not need an enterprise budget to solve an enterprise-sized problem. You need to refuse to let tool sprawl take hold, to insist that whatever you buy is usable by your least technical employee, and to treat search and permissions as the foundation rather than the optional extras.

A simple test before you buy anything

If you take one thing from this, make it a habit, not a product recommendation. Before signing off on any workplace software, ask three questions:

  1. Can someone who has never used this tool find a specific document by asking a normal question, in under a minute?
  2. Does this replace something, or just add another login? If it adds a login, what is the plan to retire it later?
  3. Will the people who are not in this meeting actually use it, or are we buying a feature we will admire and ignore?

Three questions. They will tell you more than any demo. I learned them the slow way, across 850 users and a great many “I can’t find the document” tickets. UK SMEs get to learn them the fast way, which is the whole point of writing this down.

The businesses that win the productivity question in 2026 will not be the ones with the most tools. They will be the ones whose people can find what they need, trust what they find, and get back to the actual work.

Harsh Divecha is the founder of Techspire IT, a UK partner specialising in connected digital workplaces for small and medium businesses. Before founding the company he managed a live Claromentis deployment across 850+ users in 20 countries at a multinational healthcare group.